BLOG
Enterprise SaaS spending has exploded in recent years. That’s not surprising as SaaS is the preferred software delivery model for most organizations. However, only in recent years has SaaS spending overtaken traditional software investments, with 64.5% of organizations choosing SaaS compared to 34.5% opting for on-premise. Estimates show SaaS revenues are expected to increase to $282.2 billion in 2024 and to $374.5 billion by 2028. And perhaps most telling is more and more enterprise software vendors are phasing out perpetual licenses altogether.
For all the benefits of SaaS, the cost advantages are still hotly debated. Renting versus owning has its price over the long term. But SaaS spend management challenges don’t end there. SaaS offers good cover for a lot of unintentional cost waste and enterprises must be well-versed in how to minimize overspending risk.
To gain a better understanding of SaaS spend management, one must first acknowledge how the purchase of software has evolved in the SaaS era. With on-premise software, the enterprise’s IT and IT procurement teams were involved closely in nearly every software purchasing decision. Once they had a list of business requirements and goals, they would evaluate potential candidates, determine their vendor of choice, and negotiate pricing and terms. IT would install, configure, and maintain those applications throughout the software’s lifecycle. Rinse and repeat.
With SaaS, things changed significantly. In many cases, nothing needed to be installed. In some cases, nothing needed to be maintained. SaaS vendors began marketing to departmental users. It wasn’t long before many SaaS purchases became largely decentralized. A marketing or finance department could easily bypass IT and procurement and subscribe to the features and functionality they needed at a fixed monthly rate. The term “shadow IT” emerged. And with it came a concerning lack of visibility into what the organization owned, how it was being used, if best practices were used during vendor negotiations, and general spend oversight.
A clear need for SaaS spend management emerged amid these concerns. SaaS spend management refers to the ways that a company both monitors and controls the amount of money it is spending on various SaaS subscriptions regularly. As SaaS spend has become more unwieldy, organizations have realized they have a visibility problem – particularly among their largest software estates. How many licenses do they own? Who is using them and how? What is the process for spotting and decommissioning inactive licenses? Are there redundant features and capabilities among different deployments?
Current SaaS spend management best practices address these challenges and make it easier for companies to spot and eliminate toxic spend in their organization
To understand why SaaS spend management is important, let’s look at the current state of SaaS sprawl in the enterprise. A recent article from CIO Dive shares the following:
Having said that, without the proper governance in place, the risk of material overspending on SaaS is alarmingly high.
NPI recommends enterprises focus on the following SaaS spend management best practices:
For large SaaS estates like M365, Adobe Creative Cloud, Salesforce, ServiceNow, and Workday, it’s important to gain a clear picture of what you own, who’s using it, and how it’s being used. Assessments should be performed at least once a year – or more depending on workforce changes. They are particularly useful in advance of a renewal event.
Establishing an accurate optimized usage baseline can help you more clearly define renewal demand and align cost and usage. Using standard inputs from your existing applications and tools, NPI’s SaaS license optimization assessment services provide a detailed analysis to identify specific, actionable cost reduction opportunities in two areas:
All the SaaS license optimization tactics in the world can’t fix SaaS overspending if companies are paying more than they should at the SKU level. One mistake enterprise SaaS users make is assuming SaaS pricing is inflexible and cannot be negotiated. This isn’t true. SaaS vendor pricing disparity between customers is frequent. To make sure you’re paying a fair price for the SaaS services, perform an IT price benchmark analysison your next SaaS renewal or purchase. This will identify gaps as compared to best-in-class pricing that can reduce costs significantly.
A comprehensive SaaS spend optimization strategy should focus on the following key areas:
When companies set out to reduce SaaS spend, it can be tempting to take a blanket approach, such as cutting subscriptions across the board by a set percentage. However, this tactic generally backfires. Such cuts run the risk of eliminating software that employees need. This can hurt productivity and morale.
Instead, finance and IT leaders need a strategic, user-focused approach that balances savings with business enablement.
Before making any changes, IT and finance teams need to analyze adoption and usage patterns. Gather data on license activations versus logins over time. Identify applications with a high volume of unused or inactive licenses to cut first.
Review software applications individually through the lens of current business priorities and goals. Which supports revenue-driving activities? Which enable operational efficiencies? Consider the downstream impact and align proposed subscription changes accordingly.
Be transparent about why you are making these decisions and a timeline for changes. For example, if you are replacing E5 licenses with M365, employees may need to prepare. Also, consider phasing adjustments over time in smaller increments to give users time to adapt while allowing you to continuously monitor outcomes.
The key is maintaining open lines of communication. This balanced approach helps rein in unnecessary SaaS spend without disrupting operations.
IT and procurement staff often feel overwhelmed with the work on their plate and lack the bandwidth to effectively negotiate favorable terms. There’s a lot that can be negotiated, even from boilerplate agreements. However, most internal teams lack this insight. Specialized consultants like NPI can provide industry benchmarking, licensing expertise, usage analysis, and spend optimization insights that internal teams simply cannot supply alone. The experts at NPI track thousands of deals across industries and know where opportunities are to improve negotiation outcomes for SaaS purchases and renewals.
How do you know if your organization will benefit from SaaS purchase and renewal optimization assistance? Signs include:
If large SaaS renewals like Salesforce or Workday or ServiceNow are around the corner, outside help developing a cost, usage and license-optimized renewal strategy is prudent.
IT price benchmark analysis comparing contract rates to peers can reveal significant pricing gaps. This indicates missed savings opportunities from less-than-optimal negotiations.
Growth, downsizing, or remote work transitions can drastically alter SaaS usage profiles. Consultants can rapidly realign subscription levels to evolving business environments.
Sudden or unexplainable spikes in SaaS spend signal lost visibility. External experts excel at auditing portfolios to identify cost-saving opportunities to reduce costs.
Disjointed procurement processes with disjointed SaaS buying teams can accelerate waste. NPI delivers economies of skill and scale to inform spend.
The lack of cohesive SaaS governance threatens both efficiency and cost control. Decentralized buying leaves finance with limited visibility to overall spend. IT scrambles to integrate fragmented systems. Employees endure challenging workflows.
Without a strategy, unrestrained SaaS sprawl can quickly spread out of control. It’s a fact: enterprises will overspend for 85% of their IT purchases in the next year. IT pricing and terms are notoriously inconsistent, and most organizations have limited insight into complex choices.
Conversely, a tightly orchestrated SaaS management strategy delivers amplified impact across software investments – promoting agility while maximizing value extracted from each dollar.
Strategic oversight is critical because it:
Like any major organizational initiative, developing an impactful SaaS governance strategy requires methodical planning and cross-functional collaboration. By rallying stakeholders across departments and systematically mapping current-state gaps, companies lay the groundwork for streamlined oversight.
Here are three key phases for constructing your SaaS management blueprint:
Kick things off by pulling together an interdisciplinary working group. Ensure representation spanning IT, finance, security, procurement, and influential business units. This cross-section of leaders will weigh trade-offs and guide policy decisions from planning through execution.
Next, dig into the weeds of current SaaS spend from ownership to utilization. Catalog all active subscriptions along with associated costs and contracted terms. Paint a picture of lineage and connections across systems.
With clarity on scope and opportunities, define centralized processes governing request routing, vendor selection, license administration, and usage measurement. Detail policies for procurement, access controls, and de-provisioning. Develop dashboards to monitor adoption and spending.
NPI provides comprehensive SaaS cost optimization services grounded in license optimization, price benchmark analysis, IT asset management (ITAM), and workflow automation. By leveraging NPI’s assessment, advisory, and benchmarking capabilities, enterprises can effectively control runaway SaaS waste and spend. Our analytics-driven approach provides complete visibility into SaaS investments so you can make data-driven decisions that balance savings and business enablement.
If you’d like to find out more information about SaaS spend management best practices, or how NPI can help you implement them for fast SaaS cost reductions, contact NPI today.
BULLETIN
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you accept our use of cookies.