Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

The Medical Device Industry’s Biggest Challenge: Innovation or Taxes? – NPI published in Medical Design Technology

Monday, August 2nd, 2010

In this article, NPI’s Paul Steiner discusses the political fallout that threatens economic improvements. To fund the healthcare reforms set forth by Congress, medical device manufacturers will soon be charged a 2.3 percent excise tax on the sale of most medical devices.

The threats to and opportunities for the medical device industry over the next several years will be equally substantial. Reducing rampant vendor overspending is one way to tip the scales in favor of manufacturers. By offsetting the recent tax increase, medical device companies can commit more spend to R&D, protect jobs and innovate. And it’s faster than waiting for a political solution.

NPI Interviewed by CNBC’s Ron Insana

Thursday, July 1st, 2010

Jeff Muscarella is interviewed by CNBC’s Ron Insana on his weekly radio show geared to help Fortune 500 companies cut costs immediately and effectively.

http://www.npifinancial.com/News/TV_Media_Coverage/

Enjoy!

NPI named top 50 Fastest Growing Company by Pacesetters Awards

Monday, April 26th, 2010

Last Friday morning, Jon Winsett, Jeff Muscarella, Heather Barclay and I sat down at the Interncontinental to celebrate Atlanta’s fastest growing companies. Not only was NPI honored as a finalist, we heard from Harvey MacKay – a  fresh, funny and articulate speaker. We all agreed his points were highly relevant, especially the ones associating shapes with mindset - thanks Harvey and the Pacesetters.

http://www.harveymackay.com/columns/column_this_week.cfm

the Walnut Comments on the Hidden Cost of Shipping (part 2)

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

Following on his article in Manufacturing.Net, John Haber covers the other 2 key areas for focus on cost reductions: unjust contract terms and assessorial fees

Unjust Contract Terms
If a company were to take a closer look at their contract, they may start to see the potential penalties and extra fees. The problem is that many companies don’t understand the language of their contract, or perhaps they don’t pay close enough attention to it.

“If a company has a 3-year contract and they want to renegotiate during the second year, they could face some substantial penalties,” Haber said. “That is unfair to a company that has to deal with market fluctuations and product changes, especially if they are stuck dealing with a carrier that can’t handle those types of volume issues.”

Haber adds that shipping companies may include confusing or deceiving options, like deferred rebates, which would be a discount after the fact, or the carrier could exclude fuel surcharges from rebate calculations.

Assessorial Fees
According to Haber, some shipping companies may add high fees for fuel surcharges, or add delivery area surcharges for certain zip codes, which could add substantial charges to a company’s shipping costs without their knowledge.

And these assessorial fees are rising — fees for address corrections have gone up 40 percent in two years. Ground minimum charges are up 6 percent this year, and they rose 9 percent last year. Delivery area surcharges are up 15 percent, and returns shipments are up 16.7 percent. With just about every area of shipping costs increasing, it’s important to cutback wherever possible.

“The company’s hands are tied,” Haber said. “It’s hard to absorb cost increases and fees like that. Try adding rate caps into shipping contracts, or perhaps add an opt-out clause if the fees become overwhelming.”

When looking at shipping contracts, companies can and should try to object to certain fees that they feel are unfair, Haber adds. However, going head-to-head with a major carrier probably won’t be an easy task.

“Companies can face tough negotiations with carriers,” Haber said. “They have little recourse with only two major carriers. They need leverage to get the best pricing.”

“Companies need to consider bringing in a third party that specializes in transportation costs,” Haber says. “They can find areas for cost-savings that companies may not even be aware of. They deal with carriers and contracts often, and they know what to look out for.”

the Walnut comments on the Hidden Costs of Shipping (part 1)

Friday, January 15th, 2010

In an article titled “The Hidden Costs Of Shipping” published in Manufacturing.Net on January 15, 2010, John Haber explained in depth where costs hide shipping.

“When it comes to shipping agreements, companies may not always understand the language used in their contracts, which may set them up for double-digit fee increases over the term of the contract or other unfair penalties and costs,” said John Haber, Partner, NPI.

Haber identifies three categories to focus on: annual rate increase, unjust contract terms, and assessorial fees.

Annual Rate Increases
“There is currently a lack of competition in the shipping industry, so big name companies feel they can justify 5 to 7 percent increases per year of a contract,” he said. “That’s a huge increase when prices aren’t rising and a company has a 3-year contract.”

Haber advises companies to request new pricing information if they are under contract, or they should consider opening up to bids if they aren’t.

“Rate increases may differ from carrier to carrier, and location to location,” he added. “Companies should think about updating their decision matrix that they use to determine shipping options and thoroughly analyze their shipping characteristics.”

In the end, if a company can gain a better understanding of what they are paying for and what costs they can cut back on, it will not only help their shipping bills, but their overall bottom line as well.

 

 
Home | Solutions | Approach | Our Clients | News | About NPI | Site Map